The Federal Reserve Board published a FEDS Note assessing how disability affects household financial well-being beyond the direct earnings penalty, using Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (2019–2023) data and a subjective measure of whether respondents report “doing at least okay financially.” The analysis finds that controlling for income does not eliminate the well-being gap, implying substantial “hidden costs” of disability that account for more than 40 percent of the overall difference between households with and without work-limiting disability. For prime-age (25–54) single-earner, two-adult households (around 2,420 observations), households with a disability were 21 percentage points less likely to report doing at least okay financially with no controls, 17 percentage points less likely after demographic controls, and 9 percentage points less likely after adding income controls, with the remaining gap falling to 7 percentage points when also controlling for an unexpected major medical expense. The remaining penalty is described as roughly equivalent to a USD 25,000 drop in annual household income. For one-adult households (almost 11,000 observations), the disability penalty was larger across specifications, with a remaining gap of around 16 percentage points after demographic, income, and medical controls. The note also finds female sole earners in heterosexual couples are more likely to have a partner with a work-limiting disability (31 percent versus 22 percent for male sole earners), while the raw gender gap in financial well-being (about 9 percentage points) appears to be driven by income differences. Models using overall life satisfaction show a larger remaining disability-associated penalty than for financial well-being even after controls.