The Bank of England has published Staff Working Paper No. 1,148 on wage information and applicant selection, reporting results from a field experiment that randomly added or withheld wage information in real job adverts. The paper finds that disclosing wages does not change average application volumes, but shifts applications toward higher-paying vacancies and away from lower-paying ones, while leaving average applicant quality broadly unchanged. The authors study 447 vacancies from 315 small and medium-sized firms in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, tracking over 7,000 expressions of interest and almost 4,000 applicants who attended an assessment centre with cognitive and non-cognitive testing. Wage disclosure increased the wage sensitivity of applications, with higher-wage vacancies receiving more applicants and lower-wage vacancies receiving fewer, including an estimated increase of 1.52 expressions of interest and 1.07 assessment-centre applicants per standard deviation higher posted salary (with wage elasticity rising from 0.6 to 0.7). Measures of applicant quality were largely unaffected, with only small positive effects on non-cognitive skills; the paper attributes the lack of skill-based sorting to two-sided limited information about applicants’ skills and argues that firms’ decision not to post wages can act as insurance against unproductive matches. As a Bank of England staff working paper, it is presented as research in progress and published to elicit comments and debate, and it does not represent Bank of England policy.