The European Central Bank published a blog post comparing the energy market impact of the 2026 Iran war with the 2022 Ukraine shock, concluding that a much larger disruption to oil and gas supplies has so far produced a more muted price response because markets entered the episode in stronger condition. The post says expectations that the disruption would be temporary, higher inventories, weaker demand and less intense competition for liquefied natural gas shipments helped contain price increases. It notes that the Strait of Hormuz closure cut oil supply by about 14 million barrels a day, or 14% of global supply, yet oil prices were around USD 94 a barrel by early June, up 29% from pre-conflict levels after a peak rise of more than 50%. On gas, Title Transfer Facility prices rose 53% to EUR 49 per megawatt-hour, below the increase suggested by historical relationships and below the 79% rise seen during the Ukraine crisis. For oil, the ECB points to a pre-conflict supply surplus of about 2.5 million barrels a day, higher OECD and Chinese inventories, softer demand and a larger policy response, including a 400 million barrel coordinated release of strategic stocks by the International Energy Agency. China’s oil inventories are estimated to have risen to about 115 days of import cover by early 2026, while the IEA cut its second-quarter 2026 global oil demand forecast by 3 million barrels a day from its January outlook. For gas, Europe entered 2026 with better supplied markets, more LNG import capacity and less direct exposure to Middle Eastern LNG disruptions than it had to Russian pipeline gas in 2022. The post also says Asian demand was more flexible in 2026, limiting competition for LNG cargoes and reducing pressure on global gas prices. Looking ahead, the blog says energy markets remain highly volatile, especially after renewed strikes between the United States and Iran in July triggered another rise in prices. A prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz could erode existing buffers, shift expectations away from a rapid resolution and renew stronger upward price pressure, while a sustained reopening could push prices lower given expectations of supply surpluses in oil and gas markets.