The European Central Bank has published dinner remarks by Executive Board member Philip Lane in which he, speaking in a personal capacity, outlined ECB staff analysis suggesting that a global energy shock would hurt euro area activity more and generate stronger inflation spillovers than a regional shock. He said small and clearly transitory inflation deviations do not call for a monetary policy response, whereas material and persistent overshoots could require measured or more forceful policy adjustment, assessed meeting by meeting and without pre-committing to a rate path. A Bayesian vector autoregressive model estimated by ECB staff suggests that a geopolitical oil supply shock raising the real oil price by 10 per cent on impact would lower euro area real GDP growth by around 0.2 to 0.3 percentage points in each of the first three years, with investment more affected than consumption. Separate multi-country DSGE simulations, with both regional and global shocks scaled to lift EU energy prices by 10 per cent on impact, show a larger output loss under a global shock because it also raises the price of energy-intensive imports and weakens external demand. While the direct energy-price contribution to inflation is the same by construction, the cumulative contribution of the non-energy component is about 0.4 percentage points in a regional shock versus 1.5 percentage points in a global shock. Lane said firms' selling price expectations point to higher output prices in some sectors in the coming months, but wage agreements reached since the outbreak of the war in the Middle East still indicate easing wage pressures and no reaction to higher energy prices, while food repricing has been slower than in 2022. He added that scenario analysis was included in the March ECB staff projections and will also form part of the June macroeconomic projections exercise.