In remarks by Superintendent Peter Routledge, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) set out its current risk priorities and parts of its forward regulatory and supervisory agenda, against a backdrop of slowing growth, higher unemployment, and elevated geopolitical uncertainty. The Superintendent highlighted integrity and security risks, including cyber risk, as a key concern and signalled continued focus on ensuring federally regulated financial institutions remain resilient as global tensions shift economic conditions, funding markets, and confidence. On prudential policy, the Superintendent pointed to a measured approach to recalibrating capital requirements, including draft Capital Adequacy Requirements revisions released last fall that propose reducing the risk weight on some small and medium-sized enterprise business loans to 75% from 85%, and potential further adjustments in internal-ratings-based approaches where data supports it. OSFI also outlined intensified supervisory work on non-bank financial institutions (NBFIs), including reviews of NBFI exposures, risk rating approaches, and governance, alongside plans to strengthen research and analytics on interconnectedness; its Credit Risk Management Guideline consultation aims to align with Financial Stability Board and Basel Committee principles and to ensure institutions monitor, understand, and report NBFI exposures coherently. The Superintendent also described OSFI’s focus on substance over form in assessing synthetic risk transfer transactions and reiterated that banks remain responsible for the risks retained. Looking ahead, OSFI’s streamlined approvals framework is expected to launch in June 2026 for eligible applicants including credit unions and fintechs, with shorter overall approval timelines, clearer upfront guidance, and more right-sized risk-based reviews. The Superintendent also reiterated that the Domestic Stability Buffer’s 0% to 4% range remains appropriate with the buffer set at 3.5%, and indicated it would be raised if systemic vulnerabilities materially intensify and lowered if risks clearly materialize into financial stress.