The U.S. Financial Services Committee’s Subcommittee on Financial Institutions held a hearing titled “Regulatory Overreach: The Price Tag on American Prosperity,” examining whether bank regulation and supervision have become overly burdensome and insufficiently tailored to firms’ size and risk. The session focused on reforms aimed at improving fairness, transparency and accountability in supervision, strengthening interagency coordination, and moving toward a more efficient and tailored framework while maintaining financial stability and public trust. Discussion highlighted concerns about inconsistent examination practices and the use of subjective judgments, with Subcommittee Chair Andy Barr advocating objective, risk-based metrics in examinations, including within the CAMELS framework and the use of its “management” component. Witnesses argued for stronger tailoring of enhanced prudential standards and related thresholds, including indexing existing tailoring thresholds for economic growth and inflation, and described the compliance impact on community banks, which were cited as providing nearly 60% of small business loans and over 80% of bank agricultural lending while holding about 13% of total banking assets. Testimony also addressed horizontal examinations, noting potential benefits for consistency but flagging continued transparency concerns and the risk of pushing institutions toward a single “best in class” model that may not reflect different business models.