The European Central Bank published a discussion paper by Michele Lenza and Oreste Tristani synthesising findings from ECB research projects on how heterogeneity across households and firms shapes monetary policy transmission in the euro area. It concludes that both conventional and unconventional monetary policy easing has measurable but temporary distributional effects, and that incorporating household heterogeneity improves the interpretation of transmission channels without generally changing the main picture of aggregate consumption dynamics outside specific contingencies. Households with low liquid wealth respond the most to an easing, largely through indirect general-equilibrium effects on labour income, while higher-liquidity households respond less and more through direct effects on financial returns. In one cited estimate, a 100 basis point unexpected policy rate cut raises consumption after one year by about 0.96% for “poor hand-to-mouth” households versus 0.49% for “non hand-to-mouth” households, implying a reduction in consumption inequality; related evidence suggests wage inequality can also fall after an easing. For quantitative easing, a 30 basis point decline in 10-year government bond yields is estimated to lift consumption most in the lowest liquid-wealth quintile (about 0.27% after one year) and to reduce income inequality, with little effect on wealth inequality. The paper also highlights when heterogeneity can matter for aggregate outcomes, including large shocks that redistribute wealth (such as the 2021–2023 inflation surge) and spikes in uncertainty that increase precautionary saving, and reports initial results that cross-firm heterogeneity may improve explanations and forecasts of macroeconomic variables; it further notes applications to financial stability analysis, including implications for bank capital requirements and for identifying which households are most likely to be constrained by borrower-based limits.