The Bank for International Settlements has published a BIS Quarterly Review article analysing how central banks are adapting monetary policy communication to heightened uncertainty, finding a growing use of scenario analysis alongside traditional fan charts and a move away from descriptive policy guidance towards publishing policy rate projections, often linked to alternative scenarios. Using new hand-collected data from 25 inflation-targeting or similar central banks across 2006, 2012, 2019 and 2025, the article documents a marked increase in references to uncertainty, with uncertainty-related wording in monetary policy statements rising to up to about 15% by 2025 and roughly 40% of speeches highlighting uncertainty as a key theme. In 2025, almost 75% of the sample published fan charts, nearly 70% included qualitative risk discussions, and around 45% used scenarios, up from about 25% before the Covid-19 pandemic. On the policy outlook, descriptive guidance fell from more than 55% of central banks in the 2010s to around 20% in 2025, while publication of policy rate paths or scenarios with rate paths increased but remained limited, with no single guidance tool used by more than a third of central banks and around half providing neither descriptive guidance nor a rate path. The article also sets out a taxonomy distinguishing general from specific uncertainty and discusses the practical trade-offs and challenges of the main tools, including fan-chart width after large shocks, scenario selection and calibration, and risks around market over-focus or perceived loss of flexibility when publishing rate projections.
Bank for International Settlements 2026-03-16
Bank for International Settlements research tracks central banks’ shift towards scenarios and policy rate projections as uncertainty rises
The BIS Quarterly Review highlights central banks' adaptation of monetary policy communication amid uncertainty, noting increased use of scenario analysis and policy rate projections. Using data from 25 central banks, the study shows a rise in uncertainty-related wording in statements and speeches, with fan charts and qualitative risk discussions becoming more prevalent. It also explores trade-offs of communication tools, including fan-chart width and scenario calibration.