The European Banking Authority published a report assessing the availability and accessibility of data used to identify and qualify environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks, and the feasibility of introducing a standardised methodology for identifying and qualifying credit exposures to such risks. It finds that data availability and accessibility have improved in recent years, but the ESG data landscape remains incomplete and there is still insufficient understanding and evidence of ESG risks’ effective impact on credit risk parameters. Credit institutions are increasingly assessing ESG risks, but progress varies across exposure classes and is constrained by data availability, quality and granularity. Methodologies are most mature for transition risk in corporate portfolios, where some standardisation has emerged around sector classifications, greenhouse gas emissions and counterparties’ transition plans, and for mortgage exposures, which are typically assessed using the location and energy efficiency of the property collateral. For other exposure classes, and for environmental risks beyond climate as well as social and governance risks, practices remain at an early stage and are mostly qualitative; only a few institutions apply specific methods to measure credit risk linked to ESG factors, mainly climate risk, while governance assessments show little standardisation and often rely on expert judgement. Looking ahead, the report highlights the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive and European Sustainability Reporting Standards, along with greater transparency in ESG score methodologies and External Credit Assessment Institutions’ credit risk ratings, as expected to improve the data landscape and mitigate current challenges; if regulatory standardisation is pursued, it would most likely need a sequenced approach.