Global Regulator & Central Bank News Roundup
Edition 182026Week of May 4
Global developments
The Financial Stability Institute of the Bank for International Settlements published a new Insights paper arguing that banking supervisors should consider supervisory risk appetite frameworks to define acceptable supervisory risk boundaries and strengthen risk-based prioritisation. The paper sets out core framework components including risk appetite statements, measurable indicators and governance arrangements, and identifies potential scope for international guidance.
The Financial Stability Institute of the Bank for International Settlements has published a new paper arguing that prudential supervisory authorities should consider formal supervisory risk appetite frameworks to define acceptable supervisory risk boundaries, support risk-based prioritisation and strengthen governance, culture and accountability. The paper defines supervisory risk as the risk that a supervisory authority’s action or inaction fails to achieve prudential objectives, including by missing, delaying or inadequately addressing material risks in regulated entities. The paper identifies risk appetite statements, measurable implementation indicators and governance arrangements as the core components of such frameworks. It contrasts the approaches of Canada’s Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions and the European Central Bank Single Supervisory Mechanism, noting that OSFI uses a broader enterprise-wide risk appetite framework while the ECB/SSM uses a narrower risk tolerance framework focused on supervisory prioritisation and scoping. It also sets out a five-step model for implementation: defining supervisory risk and related risk categories, developing risk tolerance scales, formulating risk appetite statements, operationalising them through qualitative and quantitative indicators, and establishing governance arrangements including independent second line oversight. The paper suggests there may be scope for international guidance, including a harmonised definition of supervisory risk and possible criteria in the Basel Core Principles to set minimum expectations for supervisory risk appetite frameworks tailored to safety and soundness mandates.
The Bank for International Settlements published a paper examining how stablecoins could affect the international monetary and financial system, especially in emerging market and developing economies (EMDEs). It argues that stablecoins are most likely to affect private sector store of value and medium of exchange functions, while the market’s roughly 98% concentration in USD-denominated stablecoins is likely to reinforce existing currency hierarchies. The paper outlines scenarios ranging from niche crypto use to digital dollarisation and domestic stablecoin integration, with outcomes depending on adoption patterns, regulatory capacity and cross-border cooperation.
New research by the Bank for International Settlements examines how stablecoins could affect the international monetary and financial system, with a particular focus on emerging market and developing economies. The paper argues that stablecoins are most likely to affect private sector store of value and medium of exchange functions, especially where macroeconomic instability makes foreign-currency instruments attractive, and that the market’s roughly 98% concentration in US dollar-denominated stablecoins is likely to reinforce existing currency hierarchies rather than displace them. The paper sets out three scenarios. Under niche adoption, stablecoins remain largely confined to crypto trading and selected cross-border corridors, leaving monetary authorities with meaningful policy autonomy. Under digital dollarisation, rapid adoption of dollar stablecoins in EMDEs could accelerate currency substitution, weaken monetary policy transmission, complicate capital controls and redirect domestic savings into reserve assets such as US Treasury bills. Under domestic stablecoin integration, local-currency stablecoins could improve payment efficiency while preserving policy autonomy, but only where jurisdictions have sufficient regulatory capacity, reserve rules, disclosure standards and interoperability arrangements. The paper concludes that outcomes will depend on adoption patterns, regulatory responses and competition with other forms of digital money, including retail central bank digital currencies and tokenised deposits. It stresses that cross-border cooperation will be needed on oversight, reserve standards, disclosure, resolution arrangements and illicit finance controls, given uneven implementation of international stablecoin standards and the inherently cross-border nature of stablecoin activity.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures and the Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions are consulting on updates to central counterparty resilience guidance under the Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures, adding an annex on initial margin transparency and responsiveness. The proposed annex would guide central counterparties on margin simulators for current and hypothetical portfolios, qualitative margin model disclosures, responsiveness frameworks, and governance and disclosure procedures for model overrides.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures and the Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions have published a consultation update to their central counterparty resilience guidance under the Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures, adding an annex on initial margin transparency and responsiveness while retaining the broader guidance on CCP governance, stress testing, coverage, margin and CCP contributions to losses. The proposed annex implements six BCBS-CPMI-IOSCO policy proposals. It would guide CCPs to provide margin simulators to clearing members and, where feasible, clients, covering current and hypothetical portfolios, CCP stress-test scenarios, key historical stress events, baseline initial margin and main systematically required add-ons. It would also expand qualitative disclosures on margin model rationale, key calibration parameters, add-on logic, thresholds and data, anti-procyclicality tools and model responsiveness components. CCPs would be expected to maintain an internal analytical and governance framework for assessing margin responsiveness in the context of coverage and cost, and to strengthen governance and disclosure around model overrides, including ex post reviews, defined decision-makers and qualitative explanations to affected clearing members.
The International Monetary Fund published analysis warning that AI-enabled cyber tools could turn cyber incidents into systemic financial stability shocks by accelerating vulnerability discovery and exploitation across shared software, cloud services, payments networks and data infrastructure. It says authorities should strengthen resilience standards, supervise systemic transmission channels, and assess firms’ ability to contain attacks, maintain critical functions and recover quickly. The IMF also calls for cyber stress testing, board-level oversight, public-private threat intelligence and stronger international coordination.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) published analysis warning that AI-enabled cyber tools are increasing the potential for cyber incidents to become systemic financial stability shocks. The analysis links faster discovery and exploitation of vulnerabilities to possible correlated failures in shared software, cloud services, payments networks and data infrastructure, with extreme cyber-incident losses potentially triggering funding strains, solvency concerns and broader market disruption. The analysis cites advanced cyber-capable AI models as examples of how attackers may operate at machine speed, including Anthropic’s controlled release of Claude Mythos Preview, which could find and exploit vulnerabilities in major operating systems and web browsers even when used by non-experts. It also notes that financial institutions are using AI-supported tools for threat detection, fraud prevention, vulnerability identification and incident response, but that benefits depend on integration, governance and human oversight. Against that risk backdrop, the IMF argues that the policy response should focus on whether the financial system can contain AI-enabled cyber incidents and maintain critical functions after defenses are breached. Authorities should strengthen resilience standards, supervise the common channels through which incidents could spread, and make cyber stress testing, scenario analysis, cyber hygiene, quality assurance, business continuity and board-level oversight part of financial stability frameworks. The analysis also calls for closer public-private collaboration on threat intelligence and incident response, stronger international coordination, information sharing and capacity development, particularly because AI-assisted attacks can propagate across borders and through sectors that rely on the same digital foundations, including finance, energy, telecommunications and public services.
Active global consultations
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions is consulting on proposed good practices to strengthen oversight of over-the-counter commodity derivatives markets by supporting the effective implementation of Principles 12, 15 and 16 on OTC data collection, intervention powers and responses to disorderly markets. The consultation responds to IOSCO’s finding that commodity market participants often hold linked positions across exchange-traded, OTC and physical markets, creating risks to price formation, volatility and market integrity when Market Authorities lack timely visibility over large or concentrated positions, including positions held under common ownership and control. The proposed practices address three areas: collection and aggregation of OTC and exchange trading activity, with a proportionate and risk-sensitive focus on beneficial ownership data, critical or significant contracts, related OTC contracts and factors such as market interdependence, size, liquidity and existing controls; preventing or addressing disorderly markets, including expectations that regulators have effective powers to intervene in relevant OTC markets and that exchanges use available information and position management tools to protect orderly trading; and information sharing and cooperation, including stronger communication between exchanges and regulators, among regulators and through cross-border mechanisms during market stress. The practices also emphasize stringent safeguards for sensitive OTC data and transparent intervention policies so oversight can improve market integrity without unnecessary or duplicative reporting burdens.
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions is consulting on proposed good practices to strengthen oversight of over-the-counter commodity derivatives markets by supporting the effective implementation of Principles 12, 15 and 16 on OTC data collection, intervention powers and responses to disorderly markets. The consultation responds to IOSCO’s finding that commodity market participants often hold linked positions across exchange-traded, OTC and physical markets, creating risks to price formation, volatility and market integrity when Market Authorities lack timely visibility over large or concentrated positions, including positions held under common ownership and control. The proposed practices address three areas: collection and aggregation of OTC and exchange trading activity, with a proportionate and risk-sensitive focus on beneficial ownership data, critical or significant contracts, related OTC contracts and factors such as market interdependence, size, liquidity and existing controls; preventing or addressing disorderly markets, including expectations that regulators have effective powers to intervene in relevant OTC markets and that exchanges use available information and position management tools to protect orderly trading; and information sharing and cooperation, including stronger communication between exchanges and regulators, among regulators and through cross-border mechanisms during market stress. The practices also emphasize stringent safeguards for sensitive OTC data and transparent intervention policies so oversight can improve market integrity without unnecessary or duplicative reporting burdens.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures and the Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions are consulting on a 2026 update to the public quantitative disclosure standards for central counterparties, with a focused aim of adding margin-related disclosures to support transparency and comparability under the Principles for financial market infrastructures. The standards set the minimum public quantitative disclosures expected of central counterparties alongside the Disclosure framework, helping authorities, participants and the public compare risk controls, understand financial resources and financial condition, assess systemic importance and evaluate the risks of direct or indirect participation. The update responds to earlier work on margining practices and the transparency and responsiveness of initial margin in centrally cleared markets, and adds new disclosures in Principle 6 and Annex 1 on initial margin responsiveness and associated volatility for the most relevant products by clearing service. The broader matrix continues to organize disclosures by relevant principles, covering credit risk, collateral, margin, liquidity risk, exchange-of-value settlement, defaults, segregation and portability, general business risk, custody and investment risk, operational risk, access and participation, tiered participation, FMI links and market data, with explanatory notes to promote accurate, comparable and appropriately contextualized reporting by central counterparties.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures and the Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions are consulting on a 2026 update to the public quantitative disclosure standards for central counterparties, with a focused aim of adding margin-related disclosures to support transparency and comparability under the Principles for financial market infrastructures. The standards set the minimum public quantitative disclosures expected of central counterparties alongside the Disclosure framework, helping authorities, participants and the public compare risk controls, understand financial resources and financial condition, assess systemic importance and evaluate the risks of direct or indirect participation. The update responds to earlier work on margining practices and the transparency and responsiveness of initial margin in centrally cleared markets, and adds new disclosures in Principle 6 and Annex 1 on initial margin responsiveness and associated volatility for the most relevant products by clearing service. The broader matrix continues to organize disclosures by relevant principles, covering credit risk, collateral, margin, liquidity risk, exchange-of-value settlement, defaults, segregation and portability, general business risk, custody and investment risk, operational risk, access and participation, tiered participation, FMI links and market data, with explanatory notes to promote accurate, comparable and appropriately contextualized reporting by central counterparties.
Regional developments
The Monetary Authority of Singapore is conducting a proof of value with five banks, the Government Technology Agency and the Singapore Police Force to test artificial intelligence and machine learning for pre-emptive scam detection using combined banking data. MAS has established a secure data-sharing environment with cryptographic protections, hashed account identifiers, restricted access and data deletion at the end of the exercise, and may later expand the models’ scope and datasets to cover additional financial crime use cases.
The Monetary Authority of Singapore is conducting a proof of value with banking industry partners, the Government Technology Agency of Singapore and the Singapore Police Force to test artificial intelligence and machine learning for pre-emptive scam detection. The exercise combines data from five banks to build more robust models that can better identify higher-risk transactions and accounts, supporting earlier assessment and intervention to reduce customer losses from scams. To support the exercise, MAS has set up a secure data-sharing environment and framework with policies and protocols for customer data protection. Data used in the proof of value will remain confidential and be protected with cryptographic techniques, bank account numbers will be hashed so only the contributing bank can identify the underlying accounts, access is limited to authorised personnel in a controlled and continuously monitored setting, and all data will be deleted at the end of the exercise. After assessing the effectiveness of the proof of value and the lessons from it, MAS may expand the scope and sophistication of the models, including by using broader datasets and covering additional use cases for preventing and countering financial crime.
The Securities and Exchange Board of India has constituted the cyber-suraksha.ai task force to coordinate responses to cybersecurity risks from artificial intelligence-led vulnerability detection tools. The advisory also requires regulated entities to strengthen vulnerability management, patching, monitoring, API security and third-party oversight.
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) in a newly released advisory has announced that it has constituted the cyber-suraksha.ai task force to coordinate the securities market’s response to cybersecurity risks from artificial intelligence-led vulnerability detection tools such as the forthcoming model Claude Mythos. The task force includes representatives from market infrastructure institutions (MIIs), qualified registrars to an issue and share transfer agents (QRTAs), qualified regulated entities (QREs) and other stakeholders. It is mandated to examine the risks posed by AI models, develop a uniform mitigation strategy, share threat intelligence and vulnerability management practices, report relevant cyber incidents and attack vectors, and review the cybersecurity posture of third-party application service providers. Under the same advisory, SEBI also set out additional mitigation measures for regulated entities, requiring them to strengthen vulnerability management, patching, monitoring, API security, risk assessment and third-party oversight in light of the speed and scale with which such tools can identify and potentially enable exploitation of existing weaknesses.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority has launched the Cargo x Pilot Programme with 21 banks to test using cargo and trade data via the Commercial Data Interchange to support trade finance digitalisation and improve financing access for Hong Kong SMEs. The pilots implement recommendations under the Data, Infrastructure and Connectivity pillars of the Project Cargo x Recommendation Report, with 2026–2027 projects focused on linking to key cargo and trade data platforms, combining trade and cash flow data for multi-dimensional credit assessment, adopting Digital Corporate Identity for trusted data sharing, and enhancing connectivity with major trade corridors.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority has launched the Cargo x Pilot Programme, bringing together 21 banks to test the use of cargo and trade data through the Commercial Data Interchange data infrastructure. The programme will run a series of pilot transactions to validate how integrated trade data can support trade finance digitalisation and improve financing access for Hong Kong small and medium-sized enterprises, particularly importers and exporters. The pilots form part of the authority’s implementation of the 20 recommendations under the Data, Infrastructure and Connectivity pillars of the Project Cargo x Recommendation Report published in January 2026. Projects planned for 2026 and 2027 will focus on four areas: connecting with key cargo and trade data platforms, combining SME trade flow and cash flow data for banks’ multi-dimensional credit assessment, adopting Digital Corporate Identity for trusted data sharing, and strengthening connectivity with key trade corridors. The participating banks, all with material trade finance businesses, have set up dedicated cross-functional taskforces to support the work alongside government agencies and industry stakeholders.
--
The European Securities and Markets Authority published two reports advancing its simplification and burden reduction agenda for EU regulatory reporting. For funds, ESMA recommends replacing fragmented and overlapping national, supervisory and statistical reporting with a single modular EU template, common data definitions and a report-once-use-many-times data flow. For transaction reporting, it validates overlapping requirements, inconsistent definitions, fragmented channels, unsynchronised rule changes, dual-sided reporting and duplicative IT systems as key cost drivers across EMIR, MiFIR and SFTR, while narrowing further work to instrument-based simplification and a longer-term report-once model. The funds framework would first consolidate AIFMD and UCITS reporting, with later extension to MMFR, statistical reporting and potentially other fund-sector obligations. ESMA favours a layered template with core modules for all funds and targeted modules based on fund type, strategy, leverage, liquidity profile, risk relevance and events such as liquidity management tool activation. The framework would be supported by a regulatory data dictionary aligned with the Commission’s wider common data dictionary work, ISO 20022 XML reporting, standard identifiers including LEI, ISIN and CFI codes, national collection through a single designated authority and transmission to an ESMA-maintained central hub for validation, storage, data sharing and common analytics. For transaction reporting, ESMA’s interim review reflects feedback from 108 responses and reframes the guiding principles as preserving information value, reducing overlaps, pursuing global alignment and balancing costs and benefits. Scenario 1b and Scenario 2b attracted little support and are being dropped, while Scenario 1a may provide medium-term relief through options such as clearer ETD and OTC derivatives delineation, dual-sided reporting reform, reduced reconciliation burdens, and targeted Level 1 changes on issues such as historical corrections, SFTR settlement-fail reporting, central-bank SFTs, corporate actions and intragroup EMIR reporting. Scenario 2a remains the preferred long-term target for integrated EMIR, MiFIR and SFTR reporting. ESMA expects to consult on funds reporting technical standards later in 2026, deliver draft AIFMD and UCITS RTS and ITS by April 2027, begin IT development in 2027 subject to funding, and go live no earlier than the first half of 2029. For transaction reporting, it plans an open hearing on 28 May and final recommendations with an independent cost-benefit analysis by July 2026.
The European Central Bank published an updated compendium of good practices for climate and nature risk management, based on information observed up to end-2024. The update shows significant institutions moving beyond initial risk identification toward more integrated frameworks linking materiality assessments, prudential transition planning, risk appetite, client engagement and ICAAP. Nature-related risk management is emerging but remains less mature than climate risk practice.
The European Central Bank has published an updated compendium of good practices for climate and nature risk management, based on information observed up to the end of 2024, to support institutions in applying proportionate practices. Notably, the update shows that significant institutions have moved beyond initial risk identification toward more integrated frameworks, with practices linking materiality assessments, prudential transition planning, strategic and sectoral targets, risk appetite, client engagement, product offering and ICAAP. The ECB also identifies more granular use of client transition plan assessments in risk classification and financing decisions, transition finance frameworks for hard-to-abate sectors, physical risk KRIs and insurance data in collateral and credit processes, and dedicated approaches for reputational, litigation and expected credit loss impacts. The ECB also highlights that nature-related risk management is emerging but less mature than climate risk practice. Institutions are starting to assess dependencies, biodiversity impacts, water stress, deforestation, pollution and land use through sensitivity metrics, sector policies, due diligence, client scoring and selective scenario analysis, although many approaches still stop short of fully quantifying financial impact.
The Eurosystem called for reforms to improve European Union banking competitiveness by reducing financial and regulatory fragmentation while preserving resilience. Key proposals include progress on a European Deposit Insurance Scheme, freer intra-group capital and liquidity movement, further prudential harmonisation, simpler capital buffers, and more integrated reporting.
The Eurosystem published its response to the European Commission’s targeted consultation on EU banking sector competitiveness, calling for reforms that improve banks’ ability to scale and compete while preserving resilience. The response identifies financial and regulatory fragmentation, including the incomplete banking union, as a core constraint on euro area banks and argues that simplification should mean harmonisation rather than deregulation. The main proposals include concrete steps towards a European Deposit Insurance Scheme with a clear implementation timetable, freer movement of capital and liquidity within cross-border banking groups subject to safeguards, further harmonisation of prudential rules by shifting more of the framework from directives to regulations, and progress on the savings and investment union. The Eurosystem also proposes simplifying the macroprudential capital stack into a non-releasable buffer and a releasable buffer, closer alignment of MREL and TLAC without reducing gone-concern resources, more proportionality for small and non-complex institutions, and a more integrated European reporting framework. The response incorporates the High Level Task Force on Simplification recommendations endorsed by the ECB Governing Council in December 2025. It also sets out ECB Banking Supervision’s four-pronged agenda to make supervision more efficient, effective and risk-based, including SREP reform, operational efficiency initiatives, work on a unified SSM supervisory culture and assessment of supervisory effectiveness."
The Bank of France and France's Ministry of the Economy have launched a national register of accounts reported for fraud risk, enabling payment service providers to share alerts on IBANs linked to potentially fraudulent accounts to improve detection and prevention of transfer fraud. The central bank-managed register is intended to strengthen vigilance against manipulation-based fraud and complements existing anti-fraud tools. Over time, the register is expected to be integrated into a broader European Union data-sharing framework under the future regulation on payment services.
The Bank of France and France's Ministry of the Economy have launched the national register of accounts reported for fraud risk, a new database maintained by the central bank that allows payment service providers to share alerts on IBANs linked to accounts that may be used by fraudsters. The launch follows publication of the implementing measures for the 6 November 2025 law aimed at strengthening the fight against banking fraud, and is intended to improve detection and prevention of transfer fraud across the payments ecosystem. Payment service providers will supply data to the register, with banks expected to be the main users. The file is designed to strengthen vigilance against manipulation-based fraud by enabling firms to flag suspicious accounts through their bank details. The authorities said no personal data will be recorded in the register and that stored data will be retained only for a limited period. The new tool complements other anti-fraud measures promoted through the Observatory for the Security of Payment Means, including confirmation of payee, number authentication mechanisms and public awareness campaigns. Over time, the register is intended to be integrated into a broader European data-sharing framework for combating fraud under the future European Union regulation on payment services.
The Bank of Spain has launched Mi CarpetaBE, a personal digital space that allows the public to centrally access information related to their interactions with the central bank, including documents submitted via the Electronic Register, electronic notifications and communications, and verification of electronic documents using the Secure Verification Code. Access requires digital identification, and future enhancements will add appointment calendars and procedure management under the Strategic Plan 2030 initiative “Un Banco conectado” to modernize digital administration.
The Bank of Spain has launched Mi CarpetaBE, a new personal digital space that lets members of the public consult information arising from their relationship with the central bank in a more accessible, clear and centralized way. In its first phase, users can access documents they have submitted through the Electronic Register, electronic notifications and communications issued by the Bank of Spain, and a function to verify the authenticity of electronic documents using the Secure Verification Code. Access to Mi CarpetaBE requires digital identification to protect the security, confidentiality and integrity of the information consulted. Future developments will expand the information and services available through the application, including a calendar of appointments requested by the user and management of procedures included in the Bank of Spain's Electronic Office. The launch forms part of the Strategic Plan 2030 initiative Un Banco conectado, which is aimed at modernizing digital administration and the user relationship with the institution.
The Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority will conduct an in-depth analysis of links between Swedish banks and private credit, and the role of private credit in the Swedish financial system, focusing on lending outside the banking sector and bond market.
The Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority has announced an in depth analysis of connections between Swedish banks and private credit, as well as the role private credit plays in the Swedish financial system. The review will focus on lending outside the banking sector and the bond market, an area that has grown globally over the past decade, particularly in the United States and the United Kingdom. The authority said it has monitored the development for some time and has not so far identified indications of material risks linked to private credit in a Swedish context. However, given further development in the global market in recent years, the analysis will examine what interlinkages may exist between Swedish banks and relevant private credit market participants.
The UK Financial Conduct Authority launched a review of the claims management market after concerns that some claims management companies and law firms are failing consumers through aggressive marketing, misleading advertising, unfair exit fees, unauthorised sign-ups and multiple representation. Working with the Solicitors Regulation Authority and other partners, the review will assess fair value, price caps, fee and funding incentives, lead generation, consumer journeys and regulatory permissions, alongside continued action on poor handling of motor finance claims.
The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has announced the launch of a review of the claims management market after concerns that some claims management companies and law firms are failing consumers. The review, conducted with the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and other regulatory partners, will assess whether consumers receive fair value, whether existing price caps remain fit for purpose where free redress routes exist, and whether fee structures, funding and insurance arrangements create conflicts of interest or poor outcomes. It will also examine lead generation, marketing and advertising across the end-to-end consumer journey, differences across regulatory regimes, and whether firms have the appropriate permissions. The FCA will look at firms it regulates, including lead generators, as well as firms authorised by others. The FCA stressed said it will continue interventions through the joint regulatory taskforce on motor finance claims, including action on misleading advertising, sign-up processes, meritless claims, multiple representation, and firms’ financial and operational resilience. The FCA has removed or amended 800 misleading adverts, enabled more than 28,000 consumers to exit contracts free of charge, and secured fee reductions by three claims management companies. The SRA on its part has 109 open investigations relating to 76 firms managing high-volume consumer claims and has closed seven firms in this area.
The Dubai Financial Services Authority is consulting on changes to its Islamic finance framework in the Dubai International Financial Centre to clarify when Authorised Firms and Authorised Market Institutions need an Islamic endorsement and to strengthen Takaful disclosures. An endorsement would be required where an Authorised Person presents business, products or funds as Islamic or Shari’a-compliant, while distribution without Shari’a compliance representations would not by itself require one.
The Dubai Financial Services Authority has launched a public consultation on proposed changes to its Islamic finance framework in the Dubai International Financial Centre. The proposals would clarify when Authorised Firms and Authorised Market Institutions need an Islamic endorsement and would strengthen disclosure requirements for Takaful sales. The framework continues to treat the DFSA as a Shari’a systems regulator, meaning it requires firms to maintain appropriate systems and controls but does not determine whether products or services comply with Shari’a. An Islamic endorsement would be required where an Authorised Person presents all or part of its business as conducted in accordance with Shari’a, provides a Financial Service for a product it presents as Islamic or Shari’a-compliant, or manages a fund presented as Islamic or Shari’a-compliant. The proposals clarify that firms would not need an endorsement solely for providing access to, or distributing, Islamic financial products such as Sukuk or Takaful, provided they do not make Shari’a compliance representations and meet existing client protection obligations. The DFSA also proposes moving Takaful disclosure requirements into the Conduct of Business module, so that all Takaful sales include information on contract features, fee calculations, surplus-sharing arrangements and possible additional contributions.
Fundi Tshazibana, Deputy Governor of the South African Reserve Bank and Chief Executive Officer of the Prudential Authority, urged financial institutions to adopt artificial intelligence (AI) responsibly, with stronger governance, risk management and supervisory oversight. She highlighted vulnerabilities including dependence on third-party AI providers, cyber risks, model risk, market stress amplification and unintended AI behaviour, noting an 86% rise in reported digital bank-fraud incidents in South Africa between 2023 and 2024. The Prudential Authority is focusing on better information, skills and calibrated regulation, including clearer AI taxonomies, disclosure, explainability, data governance and board-level accountability.
Fundi Tshazibana, Deputy Governor of the South African Reserve Bank and Chief Executive Officer of the Prudential Authority, has urged financial institutions to embrace artificial intelligence responsibly while strengthening governance, risk management and supervisory oversight. Speaking at the University of Johannesburg, Tshazibana noted that while AI is already being actively used across the financial sector and offers major opportunities to improve productivity, customer service and risk monitoring, she warned that it also introduces new vulnerabilities, highlighting five major AI-related vulnerabilities based on the Financial Stability Board's monitoring framework: growing dependence on a small number of third-party AI providers; increased cyber risks, including hacking, deepfakes and fraud; model risks such as bias, hallucinations and lack of explainability; the potential for AI-driven trading or deposit behaviour to amplify market stress; and the risk that AI systems may act in ways not intended by their operators. Tshazibana noted that reported digital bank-fraud incidents in South Africa rose by 86% between 2023 and 2024, underscoring the urgency of managing AI-enabled cyber threats. She also warned that AI could accelerate financial instability, with crises that once unfolded over days potentially playing out in minutes. She used Anthropic’s Mythos model, reportedly capable of identifying major operating-system security flaws and therefore restricted to trusted users, as an example of how frontier AI is prompting policymakers to reassess risks quickly, even where claims remain unverified. On the Prudential Authority's own approach to AI regulation and supervision, Tshazibana outlined focus on three priorities: improving information, building skills and calibrating regulation. She stressed that regulators and firms need a clearer taxonomy for AI use cases, stronger disclosure and explainability requirements, better data governance, and more insight into system-wide impacts. She also called for board-level oversight, clearer executive accountability for AI, and more robust controls around fairness testing, third-party model risk and ethical standards. Against this backdrop, she noted the ongoing work between the Prudential Authority and the Financial Sector Conduct Authority on a discussion paper setting out a regulatory approach to AI, expected early in the second half of 2026.
The Dubai Financial Services Authority, UAE Ministry of Economy and Tourism, and Capital Market Authority have launched their first joint Quality Management audit inspections to coordinate oversight of auditors across the UAE. The inspections will review audit firms’ implementation of International Standards on Quality Management 1 to promote consistent assurance processes for financial services firms operating in multiple jurisdictions.
The Dubai Financial Services Authority announced with the United Arab Emirates Ministry of Economy and Tourism and the Capital Market Authority the launch of their first joint Quality Management audit inspections, establishing a coordinated approach to oversight of auditors across the UAE. The inspections will assess how audit firms are implementing International Standards on Quality Management 1, with the aim of promoting consistent assurance processes for financial services firms operating across multiple UAE jurisdictions. The initiative builds on recently signed memorandums of understanding between the authorities to strengthen cooperation and support information exchange on auditor oversight within their respective jurisdictions. The release describes the inspections as a first step toward closer coordination and more tailored information sharing among the authorities.
The Central Bank of Syria published its 2026–2030 strategy, setting out five pillars for monetary stability, foreign-exchange market reform, banking-system soundness, digital payments, and international integration with financial inclusion. Key measures include inflation targeting, an interest-rate corridor, currency redenomination, regulated foreign-exchange and remittance channels, bank restructuring, risk-based supervision, national payments infrastructure, correspondent banking restoration, and IMF and IFRS-aligned reporting.
The Central Bank of Syria has published its 2026–2030 strategy, organised around five pillars: monetary stability, a transparent foreign exchange market, banking-sector soundness, secure digital payments, and renewed international financial integration. On monetary policy, the strategy focuses on restoring credibility and anchoring inflation expectations. It proposes a simplified inflation-targeting framework, a formal interest-rate corridor, stronger liquidity forecasting, and regular policy communications. It also includes reforms to cash management and the issuance of a new currency with two zeros deleted. The foreign exchange pillar seeks to move activity from informal markets into regulated channels. The strategy prioritises a unified framework for banks and exchange companies, stronger market monitoring, regulation of gold trading, and improvements to official foreign-exchange and remittance services. For the banking sector, the strategy combines prudential reform with stronger integrity and conduct supervision. Core measures include reviewing, restructuring and recapitalising banks, reforming deposit insurance, introducing annual stress testing, strengthening AML/CFT compliance, integrating beneficial-ownership data, and developing risk-based supervision. It also places emphasis on consumer protection and a national credit information bureau. The digital payments pillar is focused on building the infrastructure needed for a modern payments ecosystem. Key priorities include rapid payments, RTGS development, a national switch, government e-billing, cross-border payments, and access to global payment networks. These initiatives are supported by a proposed legal and supervisory framework for payment and fintech providers. Finally, the international integration and financial inclusion pillar aims to reconnect Syria’s financial system with global markets while expanding access to formal finance. It focuses on restoring correspondent banking relationships, improving IMF- and IFRS-aligned reporting, supporting SME finance and microfinance, reducing the cost of official remittances, and developing Islamic finance, among other things. Implementation is supported by several cross-cutting enablers including bot not limited to legal reform, central bank governance and independence, data quality, digital transformation and talent development. The release of the strategy comes amid the announcement of active efforts underway to perform a gap assessment of the Central Bank and the broader Syrian financial system.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission proposed amendments that would allow public companies subject to Exchange Act reporting obligations to elect semiannual interim reporting instead of quarterly reporting. Semiannual filers would file one report on new Form 10-S and one annual report each fiscal year. Form 10-S would require the same narrative disclosures and financial information as Form 10-Q.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission proposed amendments that would allow public companies subject to Exchange Act reporting obligations to elect semiannual interim reporting instead of quarterly reporting. Companies that elect the option would file one semiannual report on new Form 10-S and one annual report each fiscal year, while companies that do not elect the option would continue filing quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Form 10-S would require the same narrative disclosures and financial information as Form 10-Q, but would cover a six-month period rather than a fiscal quarter. Semiannual financial statements would be prepared under United States generally accepted accounting principles and reviewed by an auditor, but would not be required to be audited. Form 10-S would be due 40 or 45 days after the end of the first semiannual period, depending on filer status. Companies would make the election by marking a check box on Form 10-K, specified Securities Act registration statements, or Exchange Act registration statements on Form 10, as applicable. The proposal would also amend Regulation S-X to reflect the optional semiannual reporting approach in periodic reports, registration statements, and proxy statements, including by revising and simplifying rules on the age of financial statements. It would also amend transition report rules and make technical changes to existing rules and forms that refer to quarterly reporting.
The U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency published its Spring 2026 Semiannual Risk Perspective, reporting that the federal banking system remains financially strong but faces credit, market, operational and compliance risks. Bank earnings improved in 2025 on loan growth and lower funding costs, with total loans up 6 percent from end-2024, return on equity at 12.2 percent for the system and net income up 8.8 percent. Key concerns include commercial real estate refinancing risk, potential deterioration in parts of private credit, higher consumer stress among weaker-score borrowers, cyber and fraud threats, AI-enabled risks, and sanctions and Bank Secrecy Act/anti-money laundering pressures.
The U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency published its Spring 2026 Semiannual Risk Perspective, reporting that the federal banking system remains financially strong but faces key credit, market, operational and compliance risks. Bank earnings improved in 2025 on loan growth and lower funding costs, balance sheets remained strong, and aggregate credit risk stayed manageable, with first-quarter 2026 earnings releases indicating that these trends generally persisted. Total loan balances in the federal banking system grew by 6 percent from the end of 2024, while return on equity reached 12.2 percent for the system and 11 percent for community banks. Net income grew 8.8 percent for the system and 21.6 percent for community banks. The OCC highlighted refinancing risk in commercial real estate as a substantial volume of loans originated in a lower-rate environment matures over the next several years and must be refinanced at prevailing rates. Office commercial real estate is showing gradual stabilization, but some banks continue to work through legacy problem loans and banks with more than USD 250 billion in assets took additional charge-offs on office loans. Multifamily properties remain resilient despite rental rate declines in the Sun Belt, warehouse vacancy is expected to remain high in the near term, hotel performance has weakened on low room demand, and retail remains comparatively strong. In private credit, bank exposures to funds are generally performing, but weakening credit quality in some vintages, borrower types and sectors, together with increased use of restructurings and paid-in-kind mechanisms, may obscure underlying deterioration. Consumer credit stress has risen among borrowers with weaker credit scores, although OCC-supervised banks’ exposure to higher-risk consumer lending remains manageable. Operational and compliance concerns include sophisticated cybercriminal and foreign state-sponsored threats, AI-enabled cyber and fraud risks, elevated fraud and scam activity, and sanctions and Bank Secrecy Act/anti-money laundering pressures linked to geopolitical tensions.
Monetary policy developments
Rate decisions during the week of May 4–8 remained mostly cautious and hold-oriented, but the focus shifted further toward whether the Middle East shock is feeding into domestic prices. Several central banks held where inflation was still contained or domestic demand was soft enough to absorb part of the external cost increase: Malaysia kept rates unchanged at 2.75%, while Poland and Serbia stayed on hold despite fuel-price pressures linked to the conflict, treating the expected inflation rise as manageable unless broader price pressures or expectations worsen. Azerbaijan also held, supported by a strong external position and FX stability, though it revised inflation higher on imported cost pressures. Core departures from the hold pattern where visibly in countries where central banks judged that inflation risks had become more persistent. Australia raised rates 25 bp to 4.35% as higher fuel and commodity prices were already prompting wider price-setting by firms and pushing up short-term inflation expectations. Norway also increased rates 25 bp to 4.25%, following through on earlier guidance as inflation remained too high and external price pressures proved firmer than expected. Moldova delivered the largest hike, raising the base rate 150 bp to 6.50%, after its forecast showed inflation moving above the target corridor for several quarters. Georgia also tightened 25 bp to 8.25% after headline inflation rose to 5.9% and stickier price measures accelerated. Mexico was the main easing exception, cutting 25 bp to 6.50%, framing the decision as the end of its easing cycle rather than a broader dovish turn.